
GeForce MX570
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce MX570
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.
GeForce MX570
2022Radeon R9 285 / 380
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $49 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 38.3 vs 27.9 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 190W, a 165W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.7% HIGHER MSRP$199 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.9 vs 38.3 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌660% higher power demand at 190W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce MX570 better than Radeon R9 285 / 380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 285 / 380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 71 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 160 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 129 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 99 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 74 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 118 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 29 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 68 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 11 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 258 FPS | 250 FPS |
| medium | 207 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 172 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 194 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 155 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 129 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 62 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 137 FPS | 139 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 95 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 57 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce MX570 and Radeon R9 285 / 380

GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.

Radeon R9 285 / 380
Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce MX570 scores 5,738 and the Radeon R9 285 / 380 reaches 5,550 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce MX570 is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce MX570) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570) vs 3.29 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 285 / 380).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,738+3% | 5,550 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+14% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+44% | 3.29 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 112+75% |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+355% | 0.44 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce MX570 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce MX570 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 has 2 GB. The GeForce MX570 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 96 GB/s (GeForce MX570) vs 176 GB/s (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — a 83.3% advantage for the Radeon R9 285 / 380. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce MX570) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the GeForce MX570 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 96 GB/s | 176 GB/s+83% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce MX570 draws 25W versus the Radeon R9 285 / 380's 190W — a 153.5% difference. The GeForce MX570 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce MX570) vs 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-87% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-30% | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 221mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 229.5+686% | 29.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce MX570 launched at $150 MSRP, while the Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199. The GeForce MX570 costs 24.6% less ($49 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 38.3 (GeForce MX570) vs 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) — the GeForce MX570 offers 37.3% better value. The GeForce MX570 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce MX570 | Radeon R9 285 / 380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-25% | $199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 38.3+37% | 27.9 |
| Codename | GA107 | Tonga |
| Release | Maio 2022 | September 2 2014 |
| Ranking | #407 | #365 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













