GeForce RTX 4090 D vs GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | 📏 Very Large (Check Case) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $1,100 versus $1,599 for the GeForce RTX 4090 D, it costs 31% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 39.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+39.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($1,100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 D and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.
GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 27 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1560 MHz to 1860 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 450W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29,395 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 30,725 and the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti reaches 29,395 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti uses Ampere, both on 5 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 10,752 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 40 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 1860 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 84 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) with 456 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,725+5% | 29,395 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+36% | 10752 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+84% | 40 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz+35% | 1860 MHz |
| ROPs | 176+57% | 112 |
| TMUs | 456+36% | 336 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+36% | 10.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+36% | 84 |
| Tensor Cores | 456+36% | 336 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4090 D supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 24 GB of GDDR6X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 6 MB (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s | 1008 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+1100% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 D draws 425W versus the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti's 450W — a 5.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 850W (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin. Card length: 304mm vs 336mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W-6% | 450W |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin |
| Length | 304mm | 336mm |
| Height | 137mm | 140mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C-8% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 72.3+11% | 65.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3090 Ti launched at $1999 and now averages $1100. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 3090 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599-20% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1100 |
| Codename | AD102 | GA102 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | January 27 2022 |
| Ranking | #14 | #19 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 4090 D and GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
