
GeForce RTX 4090 D vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 4090 D
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce RTX 4090 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (304mm) | Standard Size (310mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $1,599 for the GeForce RTX 4090 D, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 107.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+107.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,599) | ✅More affordable ($800) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 4090 D and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

GeForce RTX 4090 D
The GeForce RTX 4090 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 28 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2280 MHz to 2520 MHz. It has 14592 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 425W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 114 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,725 points. Launch price was $1,599.

GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 8 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2340 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 8448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 66 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,828 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 4090 D scores 30,725 and the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 31,828 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 4090 D is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 14,592 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 8,448 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Raw compute: 73.54 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 44.1 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Boost clocks: 2520 MHz vs 2610 MHz. Ray tracing: 114 RT cores (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 66 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) with 456 Tensor cores vs 264.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 30,725 | 31,828+4% |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 14592+73% | 8448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 73.54 TFLOPS+67% | 44.1 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2520 MHz | 2610 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 176+83% | 96 |
| TMUs | 456+73% | 264 |
| L1 Cache | 14.3 MB+72% | 8.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+50% | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 114+73% | 66 |
| Tensor Cores | 456+73% | 264 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support modern Frame Generation technology, allowing them to insert intermediate frames to smoothen motion and boost perceived FPS in supported games.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 4090 D comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB. The GeForce RTX 4090 D offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 1008 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4090 D. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 72 MB (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER) — the GeForce RTX 4090 D has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+50% | 16 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6X | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1008 GB/s+50% | 672 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 72 MB+50% | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 2x NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs NVENC 8th gen (Dual) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 2x NVENC (8th Gen) | NVENC 8th gen (Dual) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 4090 D draws 425W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 285W — a 39.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 850W (GeForce RTX 4090 D) vs 750W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 16-pin (12VHPWR). Card length: 304mm vs 310mm, occupying 3 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 78°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 425W | 285W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 850W | 750W-12% |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 16-pin (12VHPWR) |
| Length | 304mm | 310mm |
| Height | 137mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 3 | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 78°C | 72°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 72.3 | 111.7+54% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4090 D launched at $1599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER launched at $799 and now averages $800. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 4090 D | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $799-50% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $800 |
| Codename | AD102 | AD103 |
| Release | December 28 2023 | January 8 2024 |
| Ranking | #14 | #10 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














