
GeForce RTX 5070

Radeon PRO W7900
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon PRO W7900: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 5070
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,450 less on MSRP ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 645% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($549 MSRP vs $3,999 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 295W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅Measures 245mm instead of 267mm, a 22mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon PRO W7900
2023Why buy it
- ✅15.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌GeForce RTX 5070 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌628.4% HIGHER MSRP$3,999 MSRPvs$549 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.1 vs 52.6 G3D/$ ($3,999 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ❌18% higher power demand at 295W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon PRO W7900 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon PRO W7900
The Radeon PRO W7900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1855 MHz to 2495 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 96 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,211 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the Radeon PRO W7900 reaches 28,211 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon PRO W7900 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6,144 (Radeon PRO W7900). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 61.32 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7900). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2495 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 96 (Radeon PRO W7900) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854+2% | 28,211 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 6144 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 61.32 TFLOPS+99% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz | 2495 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 192+140% |
| TMUs | 192 | 384+100% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 96+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 5070 is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W7900 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 5070 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7900 carries 48 GB. Radeon PRO W7900 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 5070 and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6 MB (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 864 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+700% | 6 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7900). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the Radeon PRO W7900's 295W — a 16.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 750W (Radeon PRO W7900). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-15% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-13% | 750W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-10% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+21% | 95.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 5070 came in at $549, while the Radeon PRO W7900 launched at $3999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 5070 was 86.3% cheaper ($3450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 52.6 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 7.1 (Radeon PRO W7900) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 640.8% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 5070 (2025 vs 2023).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon PRO W7900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-86% | $3999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.6+641% | 7.1 |
| Codename | GB205 | Navi 31 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | April 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #22 | #26 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














