
GeForce RTX 5070 vs Radeon RX 6950 XT

GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6950 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6950 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 5070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 6950 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.8%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $850 for the Radeon RX 6950 XT, it costs 35% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 58.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+58.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($850) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and Radeon RX 6950 XT

GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

Radeon RX 6950 XT
The Radeon RX 6950 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1925 MHz to 2324 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 335W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,076 points. Launch price was $1,099.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the Radeon RX 6950 XT reaches 28,076 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 6950 XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 5,120 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 23.8 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2324 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 80 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) with 192 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854+3% | 28,076 |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144+20% | 5120 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS+30% | 23.8 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+8% | 2324 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 128+60% |
| TMUs | 192 | 320+67% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+500% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 80+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6950 XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 5070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon RX 6950 XT offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 5070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 5070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s+17% | 576 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB+1100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs RDNA 2 (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs RDNA 2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode (Radeon RX 6950 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | RDNA 2 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | RDNA 2 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 decode |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6950 XT's 335W — a 29.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 850W (Radeon RX 6950 XT). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 83°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-25% | 335W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W-24% | 850W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-13% | 83°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+38% | 83.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the Radeon RX 6950 XT launched at $1099 and now averages $850. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 35.3% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.5 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 33.0 (Radeon RX 6950 XT) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 59.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 5070 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 6950 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-50% | $1099 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-35% | $850 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5+59% | 33.0 |
| Codename | GB205 | Navi 21 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | May 10 2022 |
| Ranking | #22 | #25 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














