
GeForce RTX 5070 vs RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (24 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (24 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $1,750 for the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition, it costs 69% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 205.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+205.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,750) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition

GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition
The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 577 MHz to 1432 MHz. It has 8960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 70 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,020 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition reaches 30,020 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 8,960 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 25.66 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 1432 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 70 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) with 192 Tensor cores vs 280.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854 | 30,020+4% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 8960+46% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS+20% | 25.66 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+75% | 1432 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 96+20% |
| TMUs | 192 | 280+46% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 8.8 MB+47% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 70+46% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 280+46% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition has 24 GB. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 48 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs NVENC 9th Gen (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC 6th Gen. Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC 9th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC 6th Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 72°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 70W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 167mm |
| Height | 115mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C | 72°C |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4 | 428.9+272% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition launched at $1999 and now averages $1750. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 68.6% less ($1200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.5 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 17.2 (RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 205.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF Edition |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-73% | $1999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-69% | $1750 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5+205% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GB205 | GB203 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #22 | #17 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














