GeForce RTX 5070 vs RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 5070
Popular choices:
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 5070
Performance Per Dollar RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (48 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 5070.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 5070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $550 versus $4,799 for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell, it costs 89% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 713% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+713%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($550) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($4,799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
GeForce RTX 5070
The GeForce RTX 5070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 4 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2325 MHz to 2512 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,854 points. Launch price was $549.
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 18 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1740 MHz to 2377 MHz. It has 14080 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 110 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 30,968 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 5070 scores 28,854 versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 30,968 — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell leads by 7.3%. The GeForce RTX 5070 is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on a 5 nm process. Shader units: 6,144 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 14,080 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 30.87 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 66.94 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 2512 MHz vs 2377 MHz. Ray tracing: 48 RT cores (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 110 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) with 192 Tensor cores vs 440.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,854 | 30,968+7% |
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 6144 | 14080+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 30.87 TFLOPS | 66.94 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 2512 MHz+6% | 2377 MHz |
| ROPs | 80 | 176+120% |
| TMUs | 192 | 440+129% |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB | 13.8 MB+130% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 110+129% |
| Tensor Cores | 192 | 440+129% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 5070 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has 48 GB. The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 672 GB/s (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 1024 GB/s (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — a 52.4% advantage for the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 48 MB (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 96 MB (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR7 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 672 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+52% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 48 MB | 96 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 12 Ultimate (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (9th Gen) (GeForce RTX 5070) vs NVENC (9th Gen) (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Decoder: NVDEC (6th Gen) vs NVDEC (6th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (9th Gen) | NVENC (9th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC (6th Gen) | NVDEC (6th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 5070 draws 250W versus the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The GeForce RTX 5070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 650W (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 16-pin (12VHPWR) vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 245mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin (12VHPWR) | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 245mm | 267mm |
| Height | 115mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72°C-4% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 115.4+12% | 103.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 5070 launched at $549 MSRP and currently averages $550, while the RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell launched at $6999 and now averages $4799. The GeForce RTX 5070 costs 88.5% less ($4249 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.5 (GeForce RTX 5070) vs 6.5 (RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell) — the GeForce RTX 5070 offers 707.7% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 5070 | RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $549-92% | $6999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $550-89% | $4799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.5+708% | 6.5 |
| Codename | GB205 | GB202 |
| Release | March 4 2025 | March 18 2025 |
| Ranking | #22 | #13 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 5070 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell
