Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) vs GeForce GTX 1650
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 43.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc).
| Insight | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-43.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+43.1%) |
| Longevity | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 1650
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 43.1%. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 7,869+43% |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 896+22300% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+17% | 1665 MHz |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 896 KB+17% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: QuickSync vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | QuickSync | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | QuickSync | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 229mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+250% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 104.9 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | TU117 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #495 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) and GeForce GTX 1650
