
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
2023Quadro P2000 (móvel)
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 75W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 75W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) better than Quadro P2000 (móvel)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P2000 (móvel) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 74 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 25 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 21 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 85 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 48 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 38 FPS | 57 FPS |
| medium | 25 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 20 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 248 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 198 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 165 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 124 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 141 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 104 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 63 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 40 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 41 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) and Quadro P2000 (móvel)

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The boost clock speed is 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Quadro P2000 (móvel)
Quadro P2000 (móvel)
The Quadro P2000 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 15 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1291 MHz to 1291 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.
Graphics Performance
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) scores 5,500 and the Quadro P2000 (móvel) reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is built on Xe LPG while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) uses Pascal, both on 5 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4 (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 1,152 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Boost clocks: 1950 MHz vs 1291 MHz.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500+3% | 5,353 |
| Architecture | Xe LPG | Pascal |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4 | 1152+28700% |
| Boost Clock | 1950 MHz+51% | 1291 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) draws 15W versus the Quadro P2000 (móvel)'s 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 (móvel)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 366.7+414% | 71.4 |
Value Analysis
The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) launched at $0 MSRP, while the Quadro P2000 (móvel) launched at $500. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($500 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc)) vs 10.7 (Quadro P2000 (móvel)) — the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) | Quadro P2000 (móvel) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.7 |
| Codename | Meteor Lake iGPU | GP106 |
| Release | December 14 2023 | February 15 2019 |
| Ranking | #494 | #399 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













