GRID M6-1Q
VS
FirePro V7800

GRID M6-1Q vs FirePro V7800

GRID M6-1Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
VS

FirePro V7800

2011Core: 725 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-1Q is positioned at rank 326 and the FirePro V7800 is on rank 257, so the FirePro V7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-1Q

#311
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
10705%
#326
GRID M6-1Q
MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100
100%
#327
Tesla C2050 / C2070
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30
99%
#328
Quadro FX 380
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
99%
#329
FirePro M7740
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
96%
#330
Quadro FX 570
MSRP: $199|Avg: $15
94%
#331
RTXA5000-24Q
MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100
93%
#332
GRID P40-1Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
93%
#334
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
92%
#335
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
92%
#336
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
91%
#337
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
91%
#338
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
90%
#339
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
89%
#340
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
85%
#341
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
83%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800

#106
L40S
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $7500
100%
#107
Quadro P6000
MSRP: $5999|Avg: $1500
97%
#240
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
5533%
#256
Quadro K2000D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $35
100%
#257
FirePro V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $96
100%
#258
FirePro W8000
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
100%
#259
GRID P4-8Q
MSRP: $2000|Avg: $200
99%
#260
Quadro K2000
MSRP: $599|Avg: $500
99%
#262
FirePro 3D V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $30
96%
#263
GRID M3-3020
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $50
94%
#264
GRID P40-8Q
MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150
94%
#265
GRID M40
MSRP: $1000|Avg: $100
94%
#266
FirePro V3800
MSRP: $129|Avg: $12
93%
#267
FirePro V5800
MSRP: $479|Avg: $15
93%
#268
FirePro 3D V7800
MSRP: $759|Avg: $40
92%
#269
FirePro S9050
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825
92%
#270
FirePro R5000
MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M6-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (254mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FirePro V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V7800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $96 (vs $100), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2.1%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100)
More affordable ($96)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Path of Exile 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
Counter-Strike 2
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
League of Legends
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available
Valorant
No prediction data available

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-1Q and FirePro V7800

NVIDIA

GRID M6-1Q

The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

AMD

FirePro V7800

The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.

Graphics Performance

The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the FirePro V7800 reaches 2,028 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro V7800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800).

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
G3D Mark Score
2,069+2%
2,028
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TeraScale 3
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2048+60%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+160%
1.856 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
768 KB+140%
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID M6-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7800) — the GRID M6-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+300%
0.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
DirectX
12_1+7%
11.2
Max Displays
0
3
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the FirePro V7800's 150W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (FirePro V7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 254mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
TDP
225W
150W-33%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
1mm
254mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
9.2
13.5+47%
💰

Value Analysis

The GRID M6-1Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $96. The FirePro V7800 costs 4% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 21.1 (FirePro V7800) — the FirePro V7800 offers 1.9% better value. The GRID M6-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).

FeatureGRID M6-1QFirePro V7800
MSRP
$1500
$759-49%
Avg Price (30d)
$100
$96-4%
Performance per Dollar
20.7
21.1+2%
Codename
GM204
Cayman
Release
August 30 2015
May 24 2011
Ranking
#525
#656