
GRID M6-1Q
Popular choices:

FirePro V7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M6-1Q is positioned at rank 326 and the FirePro V7800 is on rank 257, so the FirePro V7800 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M6-1Q
Performance Per Dollar FirePro V7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M6-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro V7800 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the FirePro V7800 holds the technical lead. Priced at $96 (vs $100), it costs 4% less, resulting in a 2.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) | ✅More affordable ($96) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M6-1Q and FirePro V7800

GRID M6-1Q
The GRID M6-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,069 points.

FirePro V7800
The FirePro V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,028 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M6-1Q scores 2,069 and the FirePro V7800 reaches 2,028 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M6-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the FirePro V7800 uses TeraScale 3, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1,280 (FirePro V7800). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M6-1Q) vs 1.856 TFLOPS (FirePro V7800).
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,069+2% | 2,028 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | TeraScale 3 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+160% | 1.856 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M6-1Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the FirePro V7800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V7800 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M6-1Q) vs 0.5 MB (FirePro V7800) — the GRID M6-1Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_1 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 11.2 (FirePro V7800). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_1+7% | 11.2 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M6-1Q draws 225W versus the FirePro V7800's 150W — a 40% difference. The FirePro V7800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M6-1Q) vs 350W (FirePro V7800). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 254mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 9.2 | 13.5+47% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M6-1Q launched at $1500 MSRP and currently averages $100, while the FirePro V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $96. The FirePro V7800 costs 4% less ($4 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.7 (GRID M6-1Q) vs 21.1 (FirePro V7800) — the FirePro V7800 offers 1.9% better value. The GRID M6-1Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | GRID M6-1Q | FirePro V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1500 | $759-49% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100 | $96-4% |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.7 | 21.1+2% |
| Codename | GM204 | Cayman |
| Release | August 30 2015 | May 24 2011 |
| Ranking | #525 | #656 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












