GRID M60-2Q vs Arc Graphics 140V
GRID M60-2Q
Popular choices:
Arc Graphics 140V
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-2Q is positioned at rank 305 and the Arc Graphics 140V is on rank 308, so the GRID M60-2Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q
Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140V
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Arc Graphics 140V is significantly newer (2024 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140V likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-2Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140V.
| Insight | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Xe² (2024) (3nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-2Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the Arc Graphics 140V, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 101.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+101.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-2Q and Arc Graphics 140V
GRID M60-2Q
The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.
Arc Graphics 140V
The Arc Graphics 140V is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 24 2024. It features the Xe² architecture. The boost clock speed is 2050 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 3 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,168 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the Arc Graphics 140V reaches 5,168 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc Graphics 140V uses Xe², both on 28 nm vs 3 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140V). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2050 MHz.
| Feature | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,203 | 5,168 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Xe² |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 3 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+25500% | 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 2050 MHz+74% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID M60-2Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140V has 0 MB. The GRID M60-2Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System.
| Feature | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the Arc Graphics 140V's 15W — a 175% difference. The Arc Graphics 140V is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140V). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.
| Feature | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 15W-93% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.1 | 344.5+1391% |
Value Analysis
The GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Arc Graphics 140V launched at $350 and now averages $300. The GRID M60-2Q costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.7 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 17.2 (Arc Graphics 140V) — the GRID M60-2Q offers 101.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140V is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID M60-2Q | Arc Graphics 140V |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $3000 | $350-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 34.7+102% | 17.2 |
| Codename | GM204 | Lunar Lake iGPU |
| Release | August 30 2015 | September 24 2024 |
| Ranking | #433 | #434 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID M60-2Q and Arc Graphics 140V
