GRID M60-2Q vs GRID P4-8Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-2Q vs GRID P4-8Q FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-2Q vs GRID P4-8Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
50% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$2,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
❌125% higher power demand at 225W vs 100W.

GRID P4-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,000 less on MSRP ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 52.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 100W instead of 225W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID P4-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.5% in PassMark G3D (5,283 vs 5,203), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID P4-8Q makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,000 cheaper on MSRP at $2,000 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 52.3% (2.6 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID P4-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-2Q vs GRID P4-8Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

GRID P4-8Q

The GRID P4-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 722 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,283 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the GRID P4-8Q reaches 5,283 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID P4-8Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 1,536 (GRID P4-8Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2.218 TFLOPS (GRID P4-8Q).

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	GRID P4-8Q
G3D Mark Score	5,203	5,283+2%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+33%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+118%	2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128+33%	96
L1 Cache	768 KB+33%	576 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	GRID P4-8Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR6. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q and 128-bit on the GRID P4-8Q.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	GRID P4-8Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the GRID P4-8Q's 100W — a 76.9% difference. The GRID P4-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (GRID P4-8Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	GRID P4-8Q
TDP	225W	100W-56%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	23.1	52.8+129%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-2Q came in at $3000, while the GRID P4-8Q launched at $2000. On MSRP, GRID P4-8Q was 33.3% cheaper ($1000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2.6 (GRID P4-8Q) — the GRID P4-8Q offers 52.9% better value.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	GRID P4-8Q
MSRP	$3000	$2000-33%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	2.6+53%
Codename	GM204	GM204
Release	August 30 2015	August 30 2015
Ranking	#433	#535

Search GRID M60-2Q on Amazon

Search GRID P4-8Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.