GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID M60-2Q

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

2012Core: 915 MHzBoost: 980 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS

GRID M60-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 670

2012

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,601 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 674.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 651.9% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 13.4 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • 32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 670 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (5,361 vs 5,203), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 670 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 670 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,601 cheaper on MSRP at $399 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 674.7% (13.4 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 670 vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 670

The GeForce GTX 670 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 10 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 980 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,361 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 670 scores 5,361 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 670 is built on Kepler while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,344 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 2.634 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 670) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 980 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score
5,361+3%
5,203
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1344
2048+52%
Compute (TFLOPS)
2.634 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+83%
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1178 MHz+20%
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
112
128+14%
L1 Cache
112 KB
768 KB+586%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 670 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 670 and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 670) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 670 draws 170W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 670 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 670) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GRID M60-2Q
TDP
170W-24%
225W
Recommended PSU
500W
350W-30%
Power Connector
2x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
241mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
82 C
Perf/Watt
31.5+36%
23.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 670 came in at $399, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 670 was 86.7% cheaper ($2601 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 13.4 (GeForce GTX 670) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 670 offers 688.2% better value. The newer card here is GRID M60-2Q (2015 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GTX 670GRID M60-2Q
MSRP
$399-87%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
13.4+688%
1.7
Codename
GK104
GM204
Release
May 10 2012
August 30 2015
Ranking
#424
#433

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.