GRID M60-2Q vs Radeon R9 M395X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID M60-2Q vs Radeon R9 M395X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID M60-2Q vs Radeon R9 M395X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
400% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$600 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 8.5 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M395X

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,400 less on MSRP ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 392% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 8.5 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID M60-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.6% in PassMark G3D (5,203 vs 5,120), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID M60-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 M395X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,400 cheaper on MSRP at $600 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 392% (8.5 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M395X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID M60-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID M60-2Q vs Radeon R9 M395X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

Radeon R9 M395X

The Radeon R9 M395X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,120 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the Radeon R9 M395X reaches 5,120 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon R9 M395X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 M395X). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q) vs 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M395X).

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Radeon R9 M395X
G3D Mark Score	5,203+2%	5,120
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+63%	2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128	128
L1 Cache	768 KB+50%	512 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Radeon R9 M395X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 M395X. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M395X) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Radeon R9 M395X
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	2 MB+300%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon R9 M395X's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon R9 M395X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M395X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Radeon R9 M395X
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Perf/Watt	23.1	68.3+196%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID M60-2Q came in at $3000, while the Radeon R9 M395X launched at $600. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M395X was 80% cheaper ($2400 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 8.5 (Radeon R9 M395X) — the Radeon R9 M395X offers 400% better value.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP	$3000	$600-80%
Performance per Dollar	1.7	8.5+400%
Codename	GM204	Amethyst
Release	August 30 2015	May 5 2015
Ranking	#433	#438

Search GRID M60-2Q on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M395X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.