GRID M60-2Q vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID M60-2Q is positioned at rank 305 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q is on rank 16, so the Quadro P2000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-2Q

#116

Radeon Pro SSG

MSRP: $6999|Avg: $1500

91%

#289

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

8539%

#304

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

100%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

100%

#307

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

99%

#308

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

98%

#309

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

97%

#310

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

95%

#311

FirePro 3D V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $30

94%

#312

Quadro K5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $60

92%

#313

Quadro 2000

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

91%

#314

FirePro S7150

MSRP: $2399|Avg: $459

91%

#316

FirePro W9000

MSRP: $3999|Avg: $150

89%

#317

GRID M60-4Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

88%

#318

FirePro V8800

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $100

88%

#319

Quadro K6000

MSRP: $5265|Avg: $300

88%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro P2000 Max-Q

#1

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

221%

#16

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#26

RTX A400

MSRP: $135|Avg: $135

66%

#29

Radeon Pro 5500 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $100

59%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID M60-2Q.

Insight	GRID M60-2Q	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro P2000 Max-Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID M60-2Q Benchmark Check

Quadro P2000 Max-Q Benchmark Check

League of Legends

No prediction data available

League of Legends

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID M60-2Q and Quadro P2000 Max-Q

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

Quadro P2000 Max-Q

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 5 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1215 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,353 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID M60-2Q scores 5,203 and the Quadro P2000 Max-Q reaches 5,353 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID M60-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro P2000 Max-Q uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q) vs 768 (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1468 MHz.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score	5,203	5,353+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Pascal
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	1468 MHz+25%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GRID M60-2Q	Quadro P2000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID M60-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro P2000 Max-Q's 80W — a 95.1% difference. The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID M60-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro P2000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.