Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GeForce GTX 950 vs GRID M60-2Q

CPUCPUGPUGPU
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

2015Core: 1024 MHzBoost: 1188 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS

GRID M60-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Similar parts
·······
Buy on Amazon

GeForce GTX 950 vs GRID M60-2Q Performance Spectrum

GeForce GTX 950
2 GB 90
5,357
+3.0%
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 680M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 880M SLI
brand logoGeForce GTX 580
brand logoGeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
brand logoTitan X Pascal
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GRID M60-2Q
4 GB 225
5,203
0.0%
brand logoGeForce MX350
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660
brand logoGeForce MX550
brand logoGeForce GTX 780 Ti
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070
brand logoGeForce GTX 1070 SLI
brand logoRTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GRID M60-2Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $2,841 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1842.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 90W instead of 225W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • ✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1786.8% HIGHER MSRP
    $3,000 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
  • ❌150% higher power demand at 225W vs 90W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 950 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 3% in PassMark G3D (5,357 vs 5,203), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 950 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 950 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $2,841 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $3,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1842.6% (33.7 vs 1.7), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 950 vs GRID M60-2Q Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

NVIDIA

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score
5,357+3%
5,203
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
768
2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.825 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS+164%
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1178 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
48
128+167%
L1 Cache
288 KB
768 KB+167%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID M60-2Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q carries 4 GB. GRID M60-2Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 950 and 128-bit on the GRID M60-2Q. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GRID M60-2Q
TDP
90W-60%
225W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
202mm
—
Slots
2
—
Perf/Watt
59.5+158%
23.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 950 came in at $159, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 950 was 94.7% cheaper ($2841 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 1882.4% better value.

FeatureGeForce GTX 950GRID M60-2Q
MSRP
$159-95%
$3000
Performance per Dollar
33.7+1882%
1.7
Codename
GM206
GM204
Release
August 20 2015
August 30 2015
Ranking
#425
#433
Search GeForce GTX 950 on AmazonSearch GRID M60-2Q on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.