GeForce GTX 950 vs GRID M60-2Q

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,841 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1842.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 225W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1786.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 225W vs 90W.

GeForce GTX 950

2015

GRID M60-2Q

2015

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,841 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1842.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 33.7 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 90W instead of 225W, a 135W reduction.

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.

Trade-offs

❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
1786.8% HIGHER MSRP
$3,000 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 33.7 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).
❌150% higher power demand at 225W vs 90W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce GTX 950 better than GRID M60-2Q?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 5,357 vs 5,203 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce GTX 950 is the overall package: you are getting no meaningful modern upscaling stack, plus much lower power draw (90W vs 225W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GTX 950 is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce GTX 950 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $159 MSRP. GeForce GTX 950 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce GTX 950 is about $2,841 cheaper on MSRP at $159 MSRP versus $3,000 MSRP, and you are getting 3.0% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $159 MSRP gets you lower power draw (90W vs 225W), and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Is GRID M60-2Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID M60-2Q is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $3,000 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce GTX 950 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 950 Benchmark Check

GRID M60-2Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
1080p
low	79 FPS	104 FPS
medium	64 FPS	90 FPS
high	52 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	34 FPS	44 FPS
1440p
low	66 FPS	91 FPS
medium	54 FPS	80 FPS
high	39 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	25 FPS	33 FPS
4K
low	23 FPS	29 FPS
medium	22 FPS	27 FPS
high	14 FPS	18 FPS
ultra	12 FPS	16 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GRID M60-2Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
1080p
low	107 FPS	162 FPS
medium	79 FPS	128 FPS
high	61 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	38 FPS	75 FPS
1440p
low	54 FPS	119 FPS
medium	39 FPS	92 FPS
high	26 FPS	74 FPS
ultra	17 FPS	57 FPS
4K
low	21 FPS	68 FPS
medium	14 FPS	52 FPS
high	11 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	7 FPS	32 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GRID M60-2Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
1080p
low	241 FPS	234 FPS
medium	193 FPS	187 FPS
high	161 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	121 FPS	117 FPS
1440p
low	181 FPS	176 FPS
medium	145 FPS	140 FPS
high	121 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	88 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	117 FPS
medium	96 FPS	94 FPS
high	77 FPS	78 FPS
ultra	48 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GRID M60-2Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
1080p
low	140 FPS	182 FPS
medium	113 FPS	148 FPS
high	97 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	83 FPS	103 FPS
1440p
low	102 FPS	132 FPS
medium	84 FPS	110 FPS
high	73 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	58 FPS	77 FPS
medium	46 FPS	60 FPS
high	35 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	27 FPS	36 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 950 Open GRID M60-2Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 950 and GRID M60-2Q

GeForce GTX 950

The GeForce GTX 950 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 20 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1024 MHz to 1188 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,357 points. Launch price was $159.

GRID M60-2Q

The GRID M60-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,203 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 950 scores 5,357 and the GRID M60-2Q reaches 5,203 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 950 is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID M60-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-2Q). Raw compute: 1.825 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 950) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-2Q). Boost clocks: 1188 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
G3D Mark Score	5,357+3%	5,203
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	2048+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.825 TFLOPS	4.825 TFLOPS+164%
Boost Clock	1188 MHz	1178 MHz
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	48	128+167%
L1 Cache	288 KB	768 KB+167%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 950 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M60-2Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 950 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M60-2Q has 4 GB. The GRID M60-2Q offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (GeForce GTX 950) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-2Q) — the GRID M60-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 950 draws 90W versus the GRID M60-2Q's 225W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 950 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 950) vs 350W (GRID M60-2Q). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 950	GRID M60-2Q
TDP	90W-60%	225W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	202mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	59.5+158%	23.1

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 950 launched at $159 MSRP, while the GRID M60-2Q launched at $3000. The GeForce GTX 950 costs 94.7% less ($2841 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 33.7 (GeForce GTX 950) vs 1.7 (GRID M60-2Q) — the GeForce GTX 950 offers 1882.4% better value.