
GRID P40-2Q vs GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-2Q is positioned at rank #310 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P40-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $340), it costs 85% less, resulting in a 596.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+596.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) | ✅More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-2Q and GeForce GTX 1060 3GB

GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB reaches 9,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1708 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581 | 9,815+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+78% | 1152 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+23% | 3.935 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1708 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+78% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+78% | 432 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-2Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB has 3 GB. The GRID P40-2Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 120W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 81.8+92% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $340, while the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 85.3% less ($290 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.2 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 196.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 596.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $199-97% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340 | $50-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.2 | 196.3+596% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #272 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















