
GRID P40-2Q vs GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GRID P40-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P40-2Q is positioned at rank #310 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P40-2Q.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (250mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $65 (vs $340), it costs 81% less, resulting in a 449.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+449.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($340) | ✅More affordable ($65) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P40-2Q and GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB

GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 19 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1709 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,063 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 versus the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB's 10,063 — the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB leads by 5%. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 4.375 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1709 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581 | 10,063+5% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+60% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+10% | 4.375 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1709 MHz+45% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+60% | 480 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-2Q comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P40-2Q) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GRID P40-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (FL 12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs NVENC 4th gen (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB's 120W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 250mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 120W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 400W-20% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 250mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 83.9+97% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P40-2Q launched at $5699 MSRP and currently averages $340, while the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB launched at $249 and now averages $65. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB costs 80.9% less ($275 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 28.2 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 154.8 (GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB) — the GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB offers 448.9% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $249-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $340 | $65-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.2 | 154.8+449% |
| Codename | GM204 | GP106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | July 19 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #255 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















