
GRID P40-2Q

Quadro M5000
GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro M5000 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro M5000 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro M5000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P40-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌470.5% HIGHER MSRP$5,699 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 9.4 G3D/$ ($5,699 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 225W vs 150W.
Quadro M5000
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,700 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 460.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.4 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $5,699 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 225W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P40-2Q vs Quadro M5000 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P40-2Q
The GRID P40-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,581 points.

Quadro M5000
The Quadro M5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 29 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 861 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,406 points. Launch price was $2,856.99.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P40-2Q scores 9,581 and the Quadro M5000 reaches 9,406 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P40-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M5000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 2,048 (Quadro M5000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P40-2Q) vs 4.252 TFLOPS (Quadro M5000). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,581+2% | 9,406 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+13% | 4.252 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+13% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P40-2Q has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M5000 carries 8 GB. Quadro M5000 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GRID P40-2Q and 256-bit on the Quadro M5000.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 12.1 (Quadro M5000). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GRID P40-2Q) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M5000). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GRID P40-2Q) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M5000).
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P40-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M5000's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro M5000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID P40-2Q) vs 500W (Quadro M5000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 150W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 62.7+47% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P40-2Q came in at $5699, while the Quadro M5000 launched at $999. On MSRP, Quadro M5000 was 82.5% cheaper ($4700 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.7 (GRID P40-2Q) vs 9.4 (Quadro M5000) — the Quadro M5000 offers 452.9% better value.
| Feature | GRID P40-2Q | Quadro M5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5699 | $999-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.7 | 9.4+453% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | June 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #280 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















