
GRID P6-2Q vs GeForce GTX 480

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 480
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P6-2Q is positioned at rank #296 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 480 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GRID P6-2Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 480 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 480 holds the technical lead. Priced at $100 (vs $150), it costs 33% less, resulting in a 55.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+55.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-2Q and GeForce GTX 480

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

GeForce GTX 480
The GeForce GTX 480 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,075 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-2Q scores 3,926 and the GeForce GTX 480 reaches 4,075 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 480 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 480 (GeForce GTX 480). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,926 | 4,075+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+259% | 1.345 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 128+113% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 960 KB+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 480 has 2 GB. The GRID P6-2Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) vs 0.75 MB (GeForce GTX 480) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+33% | 1.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 480). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q) vs PureVideo HD VP4 (GeForce GTX 480). Decoder: NVDEC 3 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 480).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 480's 250W — a 10.5% difference. The GRID P6-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-2Q) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 480). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W-10% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90°C |
| Perf/Watt | 17.4+7% | 16.3 |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 480 launched at $499 and now averages $100. The GeForce GTX 480 costs 33.3% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 40.8 (GeForce GTX 480) — the GeForce GTX 480 offers 55.7% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2010).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 480 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $499-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $100-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.2 | 40.8+56% |
| Codename | GM204 | GF100 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #433 | #488 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















