
GRID P6-2Q

Radeon RX 460
GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX 460 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX 460 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX 460: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GRID P6-2Q
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌1718.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,000 MSRPvs$110 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 37.3 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $110 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 225W vs 75W.
Radeon RX 460
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,890 less on MSRP ($110 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1798.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.3 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($110 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 225W, a 150W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX 460 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

Radeon RX 460
The Radeon RX 460 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1090 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,099 points. Launch price was $86.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-2Q scores 3,926 and the Radeon RX 460 reaches 4,099 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX 460 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 896 (Radeon RX 460). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q) vs 2.15 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 460). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,926 | 4,099+4% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+129% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+124% | 2.15 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1200 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+129% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+243% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 460 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 460 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-2Q and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 460. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 460) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q) vs 12 (FL 12_0) (Radeon RX 460). Vulkan: 1.3 vs Supported. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL 12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | Supported |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 460). Decoder: NVDEC 3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 460).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX 460's 75W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 460 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-2Q) vs 350W (Radeon RX 460). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.4 | 54.7+214% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GRID P6-2Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon RX 460 launched at $110. On MSRP, Radeon RX 460 was 94.5% cheaper ($1890 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 37.3 (Radeon RX 460) — the Radeon RX 460 offers 1765% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 460 (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | Radeon RX 460 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $110-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.0 | 37.3+1765% |
| Codename | GM204 | Baffin |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 8 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #485 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














