GRID P6-2Q vs Quadro M2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P6-2Q is positioned at rank #296 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q

#114

Quadro GP100

MSRP: $7000|Avg: $1335

100%

#115

Radeon Instinct MI60

MSRP: $6000|Avg: $600

99%

#281

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

7537%

#296

GRID P6-2Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

100%

#299

GRID K220Q

MSRP: $469|Avg: $40

99%

#301

FirePro W9100

MSRP: $4000|Avg: $200

99%

#302

GRID T4-8Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $1000

97%

#303

FirePro 3D V3700

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

92%

#304

GRID T4-1Q

MSRP: $1880|Avg: $600

90%

#305

GRID M60-2Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

88%

#306

NVS 310

MSRP: $159|Avg: $10

88%

#308

FirePro 3D V3750

MSRP: $199|Avg: $25

87%

#309

NVS 810

MSRP: $700|Avg: $80

87%

#310

GRID P40-2Q

MSRP: $5699|Avg: $340

86%

#311

Quadro 2000D

MSRP: $599|Avg: $40

84%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro M2000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID P6-2Q.

Insight	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Quadro M2000 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro M2000 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $150), it costs 67% less, resulting in a 207.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+207.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID P6-2Q Benchmark Check

Quadro M2000 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-2Q and Quadro M2000

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

Quadro M2000

The Quadro M2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 8 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 796 MHz to 1163 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,026 points. Launch price was $437.75.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-2Q scores 3,926 and the Quadro M2000 reaches 4,026 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro M2000 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 768 (Quadro M2000). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1.786 TFLOPS (Quadro M2000). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1163 MHz.

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
G3D Mark Score	3,926	4,026+3%
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Maxwell 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048+167%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS+170%	1.786 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+1%	1163 MHz
ROPs	64+100%	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	768 KB+167%	288 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P6-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M2000 has 4 GB. The Quadro M2000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1 MB (Quadro M2000) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q) vs 12_1 (Quadro M2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro M2000). Decoder: NVDEC 3 vs NVDEC 2nd Gen.

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
Encoder	NVENC 4	NVENC 2nd Gen
Decoder	NVDEC 3	NVDEC 2nd Gen
Codecs	H.264,H.265	—

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-2Q draws 225W versus the Quadro M2000's 75W — a 100% difference. The Quadro M2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-2Q) vs 350W (Quadro M2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID P6-2Q	Quadro M2000
TDP	225W	75W-67%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	167mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Perf/Watt	17.4	53.7+209%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro M2000 launched at $0 and now averages $50. The Quadro M2000 costs 66.7% less ($100 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 80.5 (Quadro M2000) — the Quadro M2000 offers 207.3% better value. The Quadro M2000 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).