Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL

CPUCPUGPUGPU

GRID P6-2Q

2015Core: 557 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018Core: 931 MHzBoost: 1011 MHz
Buy on Amazon

GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Performance Spectrum

GRID P6-2Q
2 GB 225
3,926
+0.5%
brand logoGeForce GTX 745
brand logoGeForce GTX 950A
brand logoGeForce GTX 675MX
brand logoGeForce GTX 960A
brand logoGeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
brand logoGeForce GTX 980M SLI
brand logoTITAN V CEO Edition
brand logoGeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Shared System RAM 65
3,906
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 5870
brand logoRadeon HD 8770
brand logoRadeon 740M
brand logoRadeon HD8970M
brand logoRadeon RX590 GME
brand logoRadeon RX 5700M
brand logoRadeon RX 6650M XT
brand logoRadeon RX 6800

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID P6-2Q

2015

Why buy it

  • ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs Unknown).
  • ✅Radeon RX Vega M GL is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GRID P6-2Q is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌
    1233.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,000 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 26.0 G3D/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
  • ❌246.2% higher power demand at 225W vs 65W.

Radeon RX Vega M GL

2018

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $1,850 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 1226.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.0 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • ✅Draws 65W instead of 225W, a 160W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌2018 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GRID P6-2Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (3,926 vs 3,906), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GRID P6-2Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 2 GB vs Unknown of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega M GL makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,850 cheaper on MSRP at $150 vs $2,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1226.5% (26.0 vs 2.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p, Radeon RX Vega M GL is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID P6-2Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID P6-2Q vs Radeon RX Vega M GL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GRID P6-2Q

The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega M GL

The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID P6-2Q scores 3,926 and the Radeon RX Vega M GL reaches 3,906 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon RX Vega M GL uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q) vs 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1011 MHz.

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
G3D Mark Score
3,926
3,906
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
GCN 4.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+60%
1280
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.825 TFLOPS+86%
2.588 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1178 MHz+17%
1011 MHz
ROPs
64+100%
32
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
768 KB+140%
320 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID P6-2Q has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL carries 0 MB. GRID P6-2Q gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID P6-2Q and 1024-bit on the Radeon RX Vega M GL. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the GRID P6-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR5
HBM2
Bus Width
64-bit
1024-bit+1500%
L2 Cache
2 MB+100%
1 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.3+8%
1.2
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Decoder: NVDEC 3 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL).

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
Encoder
NVENC 4
VCE 3.0
Decoder
NVDEC 3
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265
H.264,H.265,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID P6-2Q draws 225W versus the Radeon RX Vega M GL's 65W — a 110.3% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated.

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
TDP
225W
65W-71%
Recommended PSU
350W
1W-100%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Integrated
Length
—
0mm
Height
—
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
—
80
Perf/Watt
17.4
60.1+245%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID P6-2Q came in at $2000, while the Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega M GL was 92.5% cheaper ($1850 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.0 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) — the Radeon RX Vega M GL offers 1200% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX Vega M GL (2018 vs 2015).

FeatureGRID P6-2QRadeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP
$2000
$150-93%
Performance per Dollar
2.0
26.0+1200%
Codename
GM204
Polaris 22
Release
August 30 2015
February 1 2018
Ranking
#433
#500
Search GRID P6-2Q on AmazonSearch Radeon RX Vega M GL on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.