
GRID P6-2Q vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GRID P6-2Q
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GRID P6-2Q is positioned at rank #296 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID P6-2Q
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P6-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 750 Ti holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 272.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+272.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID P6-2Q and GeForce GTX 750 Ti

GRID P6-2Q
The GRID P6-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,926 points.

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,900 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The GRID P6-2Q scores 3,926 and the GeForce GTX 750 Ti reaches 3,900 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID P6-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 640 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P6-2Q) vs 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,926 | 3,900 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+220% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+247% | 1.389 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+9% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+220% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+140% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID P6-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GRID P6-2Q) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4 (GRID P6-2Q) vs NVENC 1st Gen (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 3 vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265 (GRID P6-2Q) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4 | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3 | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID P6-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 750 Ti's 75W — a 100% difference. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID P6-2Q) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 750 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 75W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65 |
| Perf/Watt | 17.4 | 52.0+199% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P6-2Q launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 750 Ti launched at $149 and now averages $40. The GeForce GTX 750 Ti costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.2 (GRID P6-2Q) vs 97.5 (GeForce GTX 750 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 750 Ti offers 272.1% better value. The GRID P6-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GRID P6-2Q | GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $149-93% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $40-73% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.2 | 97.5+272% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM107 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | February 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #433 | #501 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















