GRID RTX6000-1Q vs Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GRID RTX6000-1Q
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID RTX6000-1Q
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5700 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $280 versus $1,500 for the GRID RTX6000-1Q, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 428.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+428.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,500) | ✅More affordable ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
GRID RTX6000-1Q
The GRID RTX6000-1Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,617 points.
Radeon Pro 5700 XT
The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1499 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,442 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID RTX6000-1Q scores 12,617 and the Radeon Pro 5700 XT reaches 12,442 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-1Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 2,560 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 7.675 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1499 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,617+1% | 12,442 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 7.675 TFLOPS+59% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1499 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-1Q comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs RDNA 1.0 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs Unified Video Decoder 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | RDNA 1.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | Unified Video Decoder 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-1Q draws 225W versus the Radeon Pro 5700 XT's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 56.1 | 95.7+71% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-1Q launched at $6299 MSRP and currently averages $1500, while the Radeon Pro 5700 XT launched at $500 and now averages $280. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT costs 81.3% less ($1220 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 8.4 (GRID RTX6000-1Q) vs 44.4 (Radeon Pro 5700 XT) — the Radeon Pro 5700 XT offers 428.6% better value. The Radeon Pro 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-1Q | Radeon Pro 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6299 | $500-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1500 | $280-81% |
| Performance per Dollar | 8.4 | 44.4+429% |
| Codename | GM204 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #525 | #215 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID RTX6000-1Q and Radeon Pro 5700 XT
