GRID RTX6000-8Q vs GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GRID RTX6000-8Q
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is significantly newer (2022 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 177.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (8 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID RTX6000-8Q.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-177.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+177.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $209 versus $500 for the GRID RTX6000-8Q, it costs 58% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 564.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+564.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) | ✅More affordable ($209) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
GRID RTX6000-8Q
The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1552 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,535 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 12,535 — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB leads by 177.7%. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 9.098 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1777 MHz.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,514 | 12,535+178% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 9.098 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1777 MHz+51% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2.5 MB+233% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID RTX6000-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 8 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12 Ultimate |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC 5th gen.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | — | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB's 130W — a 53.5% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 130W-42% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 66°C |
| Perf/Watt | 20.1 | 96.4+380% |
Value Analysis
The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB launched at $249 and now averages $209. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB costs 58.2% less ($291 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 60.0 (GeForce RTX 3050 8GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 8GB offers 566.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 8GB is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID RTX6000-8Q | GeForce RTX 3050 8GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $500 | $209-58% |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.0 | 60.0+567% |
| Codename | GM204 | GA106 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #505 | #211 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID RTX6000-8Q and GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
