GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Arc Graphics 140T

Performance Spectrum - GPU

GRID RTX6000-8Q

225

4,514

+0.3%

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

Arc Graphics 140T

35

4,500

0.0%

Iris Plus Graphics 650

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Arc Graphics 140T

#320

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

844%

#322

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

765%

#323

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

763%

#327

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

694%

#328

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

689%

#330

Arc Graphics 140T

MSRP: $350|Avg: $300

100%

#331

Radeon 680M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80

99%

#333

GeForce 730A

MSRP: $60|Avg: $20

99%

#334

GeForce GT 745A

MSRP: $99|Avg: $20

97%

#335

GeForce 710A

MSRP: $35|Avg: $62

96%

#336

Radeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

95%

#338

GeForce MX230

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#340

RADEON HD6410D

MSRP: $35|Avg: $5

94%

#341

GeForce 820M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

94%

#342

Radeon R7 M465X

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

93%

#344

GeForce 830A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Arc Graphics 140T is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Arc Graphics 140T likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc Graphics 140T.

Insight	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))	Xe+ (2025) (Standard Node)
Ecosystem	✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Arc Graphics 140T offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $300 versus $500 for the GRID RTX6000-8Q, it costs 40% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 66.1% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+66.1%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)	✅More affordable ($300)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GRID RTX6000-8Q Benchmark Check

Arc Graphics 140T Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GRID RTX6000-8Q and Arc Graphics 140T

GRID RTX6000-8Q

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Arc Graphics 140T

The Arc Graphics 140T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the Xe+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2350 MHz. It has 8 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Arc Graphics 140T reaches 4,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Arc Graphics 140T uses Xe+. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 8 (Arc Graphics 140T). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 2350 MHz.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
G3D Mark Score	4,514	4,500
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Xe+
Shading Units	2048+25500%	8
Boost Clock	1178 MHz	2350 MHz+99%
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	XeSS
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID RTX6000-8Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Arc Graphics 140T has 0 MB. The GRID RTX6000-8Q offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 8 MB (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	Shared
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Bus Width	64-bit	System
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 12.2 (Arc Graphics 140T). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
DirectX	12_2	12.2+2%
Max Displays	0	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc Graphics 140T). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs Xe Media Engine.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	Xe Media Engine
Decoder	NVDEC 4th Gen	Xe Media Engine
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1,H.266

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Arc Graphics 140T's 35W — a 146.2% difference. The Arc Graphics 140T is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Arc Graphics 140T). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Arc Graphics 140T
TDP	225W	35W-84%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	85°C
Perf/Watt	20.1	128.6+540%

💰

Value Analysis

The GRID RTX6000-8Q launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $500, while the Arc Graphics 140T launched at $350 and now averages $300. The Arc Graphics 140T costs 40% less ($200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.0 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 15.0 (Arc Graphics 140T) — the Arc Graphics 140T offers 66.7% better value. The Arc Graphics 140T is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).