GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Tesla K40c

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Tesla K40c FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Tesla K40c: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID RTX6000-8Q

2015

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $7,699 MSRP).

Tesla K40c

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($7,699 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GRID RTX6000-8Q is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.4% in PassMark G3D (4,514 vs 4,495), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID RTX6000-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla K40c makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla K40c is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID RTX6000-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID RTX6000-8Q vs Tesla K40c Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID RTX6000-8Q

The GRID RTX6000-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,514 points.

Tesla K40c

The Tesla K40c is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,495 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GRID RTX6000-8Q scores 4,514 and the Tesla K40c reaches 4,495 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla K40c uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40c). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40c). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 876 MHz.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
G3D Mark Score	4,514	4,495
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	2048	2880+41%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.825 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+5%
Boost Clock	1178 MHz+34%	876 MHz
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	128	240+88%
L1 Cache	768 KB+220%	240 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GRID RTX6000-8Q gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Tesla K40c leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID RTX6000-8Q and 64-bit on the Tesla K40c. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40c) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+33%	1.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 11_0 (Tesla K40c). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
DirectX	12_2+9%	11_0
Max Displays	0	0

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID RTX6000-8Q draws 225W versus the Tesla K40c's 245W — a 8.5% difference. The GRID RTX6000-8Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 350W (Tesla K40c). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
TDP	225W-8%	245W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	267mm
Slots	2	2
Perf/Watt	20.1+10%	18.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID RTX6000-8Q came in at $0, while the Tesla K40c launched at $7699. On MSRP, GRID RTX6000-8Q was 100+% cheaper ($7699 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GRID RTX6000-8Q) vs 0.6 (Tesla K40c) — the GRID RTX6000-8Q offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GRID RTX6000-8Q (2015 vs 2013).

Feature	GRID RTX6000-8Q	Tesla K40c
MSRP	$0-100%	$7699
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.6
Codename	GM204	GK180
Release	August 30 2015	October 8 2013
Ranking	#505	#465

Search GRID RTX6000-8Q on Amazon

Search Tesla K40c on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.