GRID V100-2Q vs GeForce GTX 965M
GRID V100-2Q
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 965M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID V100-2Q is positioned at rank 390 and the GeForce GTX 965M is on rank 39, so the GeForce GTX 965M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 965M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 965M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-2Q.
| Insight | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 965M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100-2Q and GeForce GTX 965M
GRID V100-2Q
The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.
GeForce GTX 965M
The GeForce GTX 965M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 944 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,860 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID V100-2Q scores 3,811 and the GeForce GTX 965M reaches 3,860 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 965M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 965M). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q) vs 2.355 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 965M). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1150 MHz.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,811 | 3,860+1% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS+105% | 2.355 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz+2% | 1150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+100% | 384 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GRID V100-2Q comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 965M has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 965M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-2Q) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 965M) — the GRID V100-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100-2Q draws 225W versus the GeForce GTX 965M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 965M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-2Q) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 965M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 77.2+357% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 965M is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GeForce GTX 965M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | — |
| Codename | GM204 | GM206S |
| Release | August 30 2015 | 2016 |
| Ranking | #433 | #510 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID V100-2Q and GeForce GTX 965M
