GRID V100-2Q vs GRID M60-4Q
GRID V100-2Q
Popular choices:
GRID M60-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GRID V100-2Q is positioned at rank 390 and the GRID M60-4Q is on rank 318, so the GRID M60-4Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GRID V100-2Q
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GRID V100-2Q.
| Insight | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The GRID M60-4Q offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GRID M60-4Q holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $2,000), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1575.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1575.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GRID V100-2Q and GRID M60-4Q
GRID V100-2Q
The GRID V100-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,811 points.
GRID M60-4Q
The GRID M60-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,831 points.
Graphics Performance
The GRID V100-2Q scores 3,811 and the GRID M60-4Q reaches 3,831 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GRID V100-2Q is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GRID M60-4Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,048 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-4Q). Raw compute: 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID V100-2Q) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-4Q). Boost clocks: 1178 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,811 | 3,831 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.825 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1178 MHz | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GRID V100-2Q draws 225W versus the GRID M60-4Q's 225W — a 0% difference. The GRID M60-4Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-2Q) vs 350W (GRID M60-4Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 16.9 | 17.0 |
Value Analysis
The GRID V100-2Q launched at $10000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the GRID M60-4Q launched at $2500 and now averages $120. The GRID M60-4Q costs 94% less ($1880 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.9 (GRID V100-2Q) vs 31.9 (GRID M60-4Q) — the GRID M60-4Q offers 1578.9% better value.
| Feature | GRID V100-2Q | GRID M60-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $10000 | $2500-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $120-94% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.9 | 31.9+1579% |
| Codename | GM204 | GM204 |
| Release | August 30 2015 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #433 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GRID V100-2Q and GRID M60-4Q
