GRID V100-8Q vs Quadro FX 2000

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-8Q vs Quadro FX 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-8Q vs Quadro FX 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 128 MB).
✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16 vs 18).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
233.3% HIGHER MSRP
$10,000 MSRPvs$3,000 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
❌262.9% higher power demand at 225W vs 62W.

Quadro FX 2000

2010

Why buy it

✅+12.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $7,000 less on MSRP ($3,000 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 275% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).
✅Draws 62W instead of 225W, a 163W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 2000 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 12.5% in PassMark G3D (18 vs 16), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GRID V100-8Q is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2016 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 2000 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $7,000 cheaper on MSRP at $3,000 vs $10,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 275% (0.0 vs 0.0), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 2000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GRID V100-8Q has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-8Q vs Quadro FX 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-8Q

The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

Quadro FX 2000

The Quadro FX 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the Quadro FX 2000's 18 — the Quadro FX 2000 leads by 12.5%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the Quadro FX 2000 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 192 (Quadro FX 2000). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 2000).

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	Quadro FX 2000
G3D Mark Score	16	18+13%
Architecture	Maxwell	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	640+233%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS+248%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	40+25%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+25%	256 KB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	Quadro FX 2000
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100-8Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2000 carries 128 MB. GRID V100-8Q gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-8Q and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 2000. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 2000) — the GRID V100-8Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	Quadro FX 2000
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+300%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the Quadro FX 2000's 62W — a 113.6% difference. The Quadro FX 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	Quadro FX 2000
TDP	225W	62W-72%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.3+200%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100-8Q came in at $10000, while the Quadro FX 2000 launched at $3000. On MSRP, Quadro FX 2000 was 70% cheaper ($7000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 0.0 (Quadro FX 2000) — the Quadro FX 2000 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is GRID V100-8Q (2016 vs 2010).

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	Quadro FX 2000
MSRP	$10000	$3000-70%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	0.0
Codename	GM107	GF106
Release	May 18 2016	December 24 2010
Ranking	#622	#902

Search GRID V100-8Q on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 2000 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.