GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON XPRESS 200M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON XPRESS 200M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON XPRESS 200M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16 vs 23).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌350% higher power demand at 225W vs 50W.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

2020

Why buy it

✅+43.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅GRID V100-8Q is already obsolete for modern gaming, so RADEON XPRESS 200M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 225W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 43.8% in PassMark G3D (23 vs 16), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON XPRESS 200M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON XPRESS 200M has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON XPRESS 200M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-8Q

The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

RADEON XPRESS 200M

The RADEON XPRESS 200M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 15 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 23 — the RADEON XPRESS 200M leads by 43.8%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the RADEON XPRESS 200M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 2,560 (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 5.274 TFLOPS (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 1030 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON XPRESS 200M
G3D Mark Score	16	23+44%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	640	2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	5.274 TFLOPS+215%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz+27%	1030 MHz
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	160+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON XPRESS 200M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-8Q and 64-bit on the RADEON XPRESS 200M. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 4 MB (RADEON XPRESS 200M) — the RADEON XPRESS 200M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON XPRESS 200M
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	4 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the RADEON XPRESS 200M's 50W — a 127.3% difference. The RADEON XPRESS 200M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (RADEON XPRESS 200M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON XPRESS 200M
TDP	225W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.5+400%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON XPRESS 200M (2020 vs 2016).

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON XPRESS 200M
MSRP	$10000	—
Codename	GM107	Navi 12
Release	May 18 2016	June 15 2020
Ranking	#622	#283

Search GRID V100-8Q on Amazon

Search RADEON XPRESS 200M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.