GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON 9800 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON 9800 SE FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON 9800 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GRID V100-8Q

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($10,000 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (16 vs 24).
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌309.1% higher power demand at 225W vs 55W.

RADEON 9800 SE

2025

Why buy it

✅+50% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) on 4nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 55W instead of 225W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $10,000 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9800 SE is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 50% in PassMark G3D (24 vs 16), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RADEON 9800 SE is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 4nm process instead of 28nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2025 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GRID V100-8Q makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GRID V100-8Q is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, RADEON 9800 SE has the stronger long-term case.

GRID V100-8Q vs RADEON 9800 SE Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GRID V100-8Q

The GRID V100-8Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16 points.

RADEON 9800 SE

The RADEON 9800 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 24 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GRID V100-8Q scores 16 versus the RADEON 9800 SE's 24 — the RADEON 9800 SE leads by 50%. The GRID V100-8Q is built on Maxwell while the RADEON 9800 SE uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 640 (GRID V100-8Q) vs 2,560 (RADEON 9800 SE). Raw compute: 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID V100-8Q) vs 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800 SE). Boost clocks: 1306 MHz vs 2900 MHz.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON 9800 SE
G3D Mark Score	16	24+50%
Architecture	Maxwell	RDNA 3.5
Process Node	28 nm	4 nm
Shading Units	640	2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.672 TFLOPS	14.85 TFLOPS+788%
Boost Clock	1306 MHz	2900 MHz+122%
ROPs	16	64+300%
TMUs	40	160+300%
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON 9800 SE
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GRID V100-8Q has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9800 SE carries 256 MB. GRID V100-8Q gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GRID V100-8Q and 64-bit on the RADEON 9800 SE. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GRID V100-8Q) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9800 SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON 9800 SE
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GRID V100-8Q draws 225W versus the RADEON 9800 SE's 55W — a 121.4% difference. The RADEON 9800 SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GRID V100-8Q) vs 350W (RADEON 9800 SE). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON 9800 SE
TDP	225W	55W-76%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.1	0.4+300%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GRID V100-8Q came in at $10000, while the RADEON 9800 SE launched at $0. On MSRP, RADEON 9800 SE was 100+% cheaper ($10000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.0 (GRID V100-8Q) vs Infinity (RADEON 9800 SE) — the RADEON 9800 SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9800 SE (2025 vs 2016).

Feature	GRID V100-8Q	RADEON 9800 SE
MSRP	$10000	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	0.0	Infinity
Codename	GM107	Strix Halo
Release	May 18 2016	January 6 2025
Ranking	#622	#98

Search GRID V100-8Q on Amazon

Search RADEON 9800 SE on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.