GX-210JA vs Celeron D 352

CPU

GPU

GX-210JA

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 1 GHz2013

Celeron D 352

1 Cores1 Thrd84 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

GX-210JA

2 / 2

425

+1.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron D 352

1 / 1

418

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GX-210JA is positioned at rank 1119 and the Celeron D 352 is on rank 1062, so the Celeron D 352 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA

#1107

Atom x5-Z8300

MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A

3452%

#1108

Atom Z3735G

MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A

3401%

#1109

Core i5-480M

MSRP: $81|Avg: $77

3122%

#1110

Core i5-460M

MSRP: $80|Avg: $129

3108%

#1111

Core i5-2540M

MSRP: $266|Avg: $10

3080%

#1113

Core i5-450M

MSRP: $32|Avg: $31

2974%

#1114

Core i3-380M

MSRP: $49|Avg: $25

2852%

#1115

Core i5-430M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33

2847%

#1116

Core 2 Duo T6600

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4

2771%

#1119

GX-210JA

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#1120

VIA Nano U2250

MSRP: $50|Avg: $10

100%

#1121

Core i5-560M

MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A

99%

#1122

Pentium U5600

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

98%

#1123

Core m5-6Y57

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

98%

#1125

Core i7-610E

MSRP: $250|Avg: $40

97%

#1126

Core i5-5350U

MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A

97%

#1127

Core i3-4100E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $30

97%

#1128

Pentium Dual Core T4300

MSRP: $150|Avg: $99

97%

#1129

Core i7-3520M

MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A

97%

#1130

Core i3-2310E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $20

96%

#1131

Core i5-2510E

MSRP: $230|Avg: $30

96%

#1132

Core m5-6Y54

MSRP: $281|Avg: $281

96%

#1133

Core i3-2330E

MSRP: $225|Avg: $10

95%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron D 352

Ryzen 9 7950X

MSRP: $194|Avg: $20

51438%

Core i9-10900T

MSRP: $120|Avg: $5

48604%

Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE

MSRP: $423|Avg: $5

35290%

Ryzen Threadripper 3960X

MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85

10632%

Ryzen 9 9950X

MSRP: $649|Avg: $129

8421%

Ryzen 5 8400F

MSRP: $303|Avg: $55

7367%

Ryzen 7 PRO 2700

MSRP: $299|Avg: $60

4219%

Ryzen 5 2600X

MSRP: $229|Avg: $55

4164%

Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G

MSRP: $150|Avg: $60

3792%

#10

Core Ultra 5 245KF

MSRP: $294|Avg: $189

3791%

#11

Ryzen 5 5500

MSRP: $159|Avg: $85

3749%

#12

Ryzen 5 3600

MSRP: $199|Avg: $80

3648%

#13

Core i3-9100E

MSRP: $202|Avg: $30

3597%

#14

Core Ultra 5 245K

MSRP: $319|Avg: $200

3582%

#15

Core i3-8300T

MSRP: $138|Avg: $25

3550%

#1062

Celeron D 352

MSRP: $69|Avg: $15

100%

#1063

Core i7-970

MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289

100%

#1064

Core i7-880

MSRP: $583|Avg: $40

97%

#1065

Pentium D 820

MSRP: $241|Avg: $20

97%

#1066

Celeron 2.10

MSRP: $49|Avg: $49

96%

#1067

Core i7-950

MSRP: $562|Avg: $15

95%

#1068

Sempron 3100+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $15

94%

#1069

Athlon II X4 635

MSRP: $400|Avg: $250

93%

#1070

Core 2 Duo E6750

MSRP: $183|Avg: $15

93%

#1071

Core i7-940

MSRP: $562|Avg: $90

89%

#1072

Celeron 2.40

MSRP: $69|Avg: $13

83%

#1073

Sempron 2800+

MSRP: $65|Avg: $29

81%

#1074

Athlon 64 3100+

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

78%

#1075

Sempron 3600+

MSRP: $105|Avg: $20

76%

#1076

Celeron 2.80

MSRP: $100|Avg: $15

71%

#1077

Athlon 64 X2 6000+

MSRP: $450|Avg: $20

67%

Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The GX-210JA (2013) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.

Insight	GX-210JA	Celeron D 352
Gaming	❌ Lower gaming performance	✅ Superior gaming performance
Workstation	✅ Better multi-core power	❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity	🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm)	🛑 Legacy (Cedar Mill (2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron D 352 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.

Insight	GX-210JA	Celeron D 352
Cost Efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency	❌ Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅ More affordable ($0)	⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

GX-210JA Benchmark Check

Celeron D 352 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GX-210JA and Celeron D 352

GX-210JA

The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron D 352

The Celeron D 352 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Cedar Mill (2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 86 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 418 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The GX-210JA packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron D 352 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the GX-210JA versus 3.2 GHz on the Celeron D 352 — a 104.8% clock advantage for the Celeron D 352. The GX-210JA uses the Temash (2013) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron D 352 uses Cedar Mill (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the GX-210JA scores 425 against the Celeron D 352's 418 — a 1.7% lead for the GX-210JA.

Feature	GX-210JA	Celeron D 352
Cores / Threads	2 / 2+100%	1 / 1
Boost Clock	1 GHz	3.2 GHz+220%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1 MB+100%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-57%	65 nm
Architecture	Temash (2013)	Cedar Mill (2006)
PassMark	425+2%	418
Geekbench 6 Single	—	180

🧠

Memory & Platform

The GX-210JA uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron D 352 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	GX-210JA	Celeron D 352
Socket	FT3	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	—	800
Max RAM Capacity	—	4
RAM Channels	—	2
ECC Support	—	❌
PCIe Lanes	—	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (GX-210JA) / false (Celeron D 352). Primary use case: Celeron D 352 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron D 352 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.