CPU
GPU
GX-210JA
Core Solo T1400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GX-210JA is positioned at rank 1119 and the Core Solo T1400 is on rank 1236, so the GX-210JA offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GX-210JA
Performance Per Dollar Core Solo T1400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | GX-210JA | Core Solo T1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Temash (2013) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | GX-210JA | Core Solo T1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GX-210JA and Core Solo T1400
GX-210JA
The GX-210JA is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 May 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Temash (2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.
Core Solo T1400
The Core Solo T1400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.83 GHz, with boost up to 1.83 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 27 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 428 points. Launch price was $249.
Processing Power
The GX-210JA packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Core Solo T1400 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the GX-210JA has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 1 GHz on the GX-210JA versus 1.83 GHz on the Core Solo T1400 — a 58.7% clock advantage for the Core Solo T1400. The GX-210JA uses the Temash (2013) architecture (28 nm), while the Core Solo T1400 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the GX-210JA scores 425 against the Core Solo T1400's 428 — a 0.7% lead for the Core Solo T1400.
| Feature | GX-210JA | Core Solo T1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2+100% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 1 GHz | 1.83 GHz+83% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.83 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Temash (2013) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| PassMark | 425 | 428 |
Memory & Platform
The GX-210JA uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Solo T1400 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | GX-210JA | Core Solo T1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on GX-210JA and Core Solo T1400
