HD Graphics 520
VS
GRID M10-0B

HD Graphics 520 vs GRID M10-0B

HD Graphics 520

2015Core: 300 MHzBoost: 900 MHz
VS

GRID M10-0B

2016Core: 1033 MHzBoost: 1306 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank 389 and the GRID M10-0B is on rank 403, so the HD Graphics 520 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520

#379
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1261%
#381
1143%
#382
1140%
#386
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1037%
#387
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1030%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
100%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
96%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
93%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
93%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
92%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
#404
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GRID M10-0B

#388
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
67150%
#403
GRID M10-0B
MSRP: $4000|Avg: $1000
100%
#404
Quadro FX 4600
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $50
91%
#406
GRID K340
MSRP: $3299|Avg: $57
91%
#407
Quadro FX 5600
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $50
82%
#409
Quadro FX 3500
MSRP: $1599|Avg: $1599
77%
#410
Quadro FX 1400
MSRP: $799|Avg: $30
73%
#411
GRID K1
MSRP: $4140|Avg: $120
73%
#413
GRID P4-1Q
MSRP: $5890|Avg: $185
55%
#414
GRID RTX6000-2Q
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $1500
45%
#417
GRID M60-0B
MSRP: $19900|Avg: $19900
41%
#418
Quadro FX 5500
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $30
36%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GRID M10-0B is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.

InsightHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%)
Leading raw performance (+1.2%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The HD Graphics 520 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the HD Graphics 520 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $1,000), it costs 97% less, resulting in a 2724.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+2724.3%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($35)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,000)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and GRID M10-0B

Intel

HD Graphics 520

The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.

NVIDIA

GRID M10-0B

The GRID M10-0B is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 871 points.

Graphics Performance

The HD Graphics 520 scores 861 and the GRID M10-0B reaches 871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GRID M10-0B uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm+ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 640 (GRID M10-0B). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-0B). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 1306 MHz.

FeatureHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
G3D Mark Score
861
871+1%
Architecture
Generation 9.0
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm+
28 nm
Shading Units
192
640+233%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.3456 TFLOPS
1.672 TFLOPS+384%
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1306 MHz+45%
ROPs
3
16+433%
TMUs
24
40+67%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-0B has 512 MB. The GRID M10-0B offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

FeatureHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
0.5 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Bus Width
System
64-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the GRID M10-0B's 225W — a 175% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 350W (GRID M10-0B). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
TDP
15W-93%
225W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
350W
Power Connector
Integrated
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
57.4+1372%
3.9
💰

Value Analysis

The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GRID M10-0B launched at $4000 and now averages $1000. The HD Graphics 520 costs 96.5% less ($965 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 0.9 (GRID M10-0B) — the HD Graphics 520 offers 2633.3% better value. The GRID M10-0B is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureHD Graphics 520GRID M10-0B
MSRP
$100-98%
$4000
Avg Price (30d)
$35-97%
$1000
Performance per Dollar
24.6+2633%
0.9
Codename
Skylake GT2
GM107
Release
September 1 2015
May 18 2016
Ranking
#929
#622