HD Graphics 520 vs GeForce RTX 4060
HD Graphics 520
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The HD Graphics 520 is positioned at rank #389 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar HD Graphics 520
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The HD Graphics 520 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2170.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the HD Graphics 520.
| Insight | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2170.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2170.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $299 (vs $35), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 165.8% better value per dollar than the HD Graphics 520.
| Insight | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+165.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of HD Graphics 520 and GeForce RTX 4060
HD Graphics 520
The HD Graphics 520 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 1 2015. It features the Generation 9.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 861 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the HD Graphics 520 scores 861 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 2170.4%. The HD Graphics 520 is built on Generation 9.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm+ vs 5 nm. Shader units: 192 (HD Graphics 520) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.3456 TFLOPS (HD Graphics 520) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060). Boost clocks: 900 MHz vs 2460 MHz.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 861 | 19,548+2170% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm+ | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 3072+1500% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.3456 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+4272% |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | 2460 MHz+173% |
| ROPs | 3 | 48+1500% |
| TMUs | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The HD Graphics 520 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The HD Graphics 520 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 272 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The HD Graphics 520 draws 15W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 153.8% difference. The HD Graphics 520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (HD Graphics 520) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin.
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-87% | 115W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | — | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 57.4 | 170.0+196% |
Value Analysis
The HD Graphics 520 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The HD Graphics 520 costs 88.3% less ($264 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 24.6 (HD Graphics 520) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 offers 165.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | HD Graphics 520 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-67% | $299 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-88% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 24.6 | 65.4+166% |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | AD107 |
| Release | September 1 2015 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #929 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on HD Graphics 520 and GeForce RTX 4060
