
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is positioned at rank #30 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Great cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Intel Arc Pro A30M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 770 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and GeForce GTX 770

Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the GeForce GTX 770 reaches 5,961 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the GeForce GTX 770 uses Kepler, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,862 | 5,961+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+23% | 3.333 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+84% | 1085 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+700% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the GeForce GTX 770's 230W — a 128.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 770). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-78% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-42% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 117.2+353% | 25.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | GeForce GTX 770 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $40 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GK104 |
| Release | August 8 2022 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #402 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















