Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon R9 380

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon R9 380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon R9 380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 220W, a 170W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 380 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 30.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon R9 380

2015

Why buy it

✅7.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 30.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌340% higher power demand at 220W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 380 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.4% in PassMark G3D (6,000 vs 5,862), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Intel Arc Pro A30M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2015. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R9 380 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 380 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Intel Arc Pro A30M has the stronger long-term case.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon R9 380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon R9 380

The Radeon R9 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,000 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the Radeon R9 380 reaches 6,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon R9 380 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 1,792 (Radeon R9 380). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 3.476 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 970 MHz.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon R9 380
G3D Mark Score	5,862	6,000+2%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	GCN 3.0
Process Node	6 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1024	1792+75%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS+18%	3.476 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2000 MHz+106%	970 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64	112+75%
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon R9 380
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M and 256-bit on the Radeon R9 380. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 380) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon R9 380
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	182.4 GB/s
Bus Width	System	256-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+700%	0.5 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon R9 380's 220W — a 125.9% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon R9 380
TDP	50W-77%	220W
Recommended PSU	350W-30%	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	117.2+329%	27.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A30M (2022 vs 2015).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon R9 380
MSRP	—	$199
Codename	DG2-128	Antigua
Release	August 8 2022	June 18 2015
Ranking	#402	#396

Search Intel Arc Pro A30M on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.