Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Performance Spectrum

Intel Arc Pro A30M

4 GB 50

5,862

0.0%

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

4 GB 100

6,012

+2.6%

Radeon RX 560X

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 100W, a 50W reduction.
✅More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 10.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $600 MSRP).

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

2022

Why buy it

✅47.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 10.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌100% higher power demand at 100W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.6% in PassMark G3D (6,012 vs 5,862), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and 32 vs 8 ray-tracing units. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

Intel Arc Pro A30M vs Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

The Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,012 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS reaches 6,012 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS uses RDNA 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2,048 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2100 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 32 (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS).

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
G3D Mark Score	5,862	6,012+3%
Architecture	Generation 12.7	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	6 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1024	2048+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.096 TFLOPS	8.602 TFLOPS+110%
Boost Clock	2000 MHz	2100 MHz+5%
ROPs	32	64+100%
TMUs	64	128+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores	8	32+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of Shared. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M and System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Intel Arc Pro A30M	Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	System	System
Bus Width	System	System
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS's 100W — a 66.7% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.