Intel Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is positioned at rank 30 and the RTX A400 is on rank 26, so the RTX A400 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M.
| Insight | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) |
| Longevity | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A400 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel Arc Pro A30M and RTX A400
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,862 | 5,983+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+51% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+14% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8+33% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 117.2 | 119.7+2% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $135 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $135 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA107 |
| Release | August 8 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #402 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A30M and RTX A400
