Intel Arc Pro A30M
RTX A400
Intel Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Intel Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- ✅68.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 44.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
RTX A400
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A30M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Intel Arc Pro A30M vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel Arc Pro A30M scores 5,862 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is built on Generation 12.7 while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 1762 MHz. Ray tracing: 8 RT cores (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 6 (RTX A400) vs 24.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,862 | 5,983+2% |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+33% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+51% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz+14% | 1762 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 8+33% | 6 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A400 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A30M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M and 128-bit on the RTX A400.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel Arc Pro A30M draws 50W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 0% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 117.2 | 119.7+2% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Intel Arc Pro A30M | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $135 |
| Codename | DG2-128 | GA107 |
| Release | August 8 2022 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #402 | #397 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel Arc Pro A30M and RTX A400
