GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M
GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is significantly newer (2022 vs 2013). The Intel Arc Pro A30M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 770 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro A30M.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 770 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961+2% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+50% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 2000 MHz+84% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 4 MB+700% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9 | 117.2+353% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | DG2-128 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #398 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 770 and Intel Arc Pro A30M
