GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 770

2013

Why buy it

  • βœ…Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower average FPS than Intel Arc Pro A30M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • ❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022

Why buy it

  • βœ…5.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • βœ…Better long-term bet: Generation 12.7 (2022βˆ’2023) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • βœ…Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Intel Arc Pro A30M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 5.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 770 instead at 5,961 vs 5,862, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro A30M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 8 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Intel Arc Pro A30M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M reaches 5,862 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 2000 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Intel Arc Pro A30M
G3D Mark Score
5,961+2%
5,862
Architecture
Kepler
Generation 12.7
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1536+50%
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.333 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+23%
Boost Clock
1085 MHz
2000 MHz+84%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
128+100%
64
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 770 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Intel Arc Pro A30M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Intel Arc Pro A30M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770 and System on the Intel Arc Pro A30M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) β€” the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Intel Arc Pro A30M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
System
Bus Width
256-bit
System
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
4 MB+700%
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W β€” a 128.6% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Intel Arc Pro A30M
TDP
230W
50W-78%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
β€”
Height
111mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Temp (Load)
80Β°C
β€”
Perf/Watt
25.9
117.2+353%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Intel Arc Pro A30M (2022 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Intel Arc Pro A30M
MSRP
$399
β€”
Codename
GK104
DG2-128
Release
May 30 2013
August 8 2022
Ranking
#398
#402

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.