GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX A400
GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:
RTX A400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar RTX A400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX A400 is significantly newer (2024 vs 2013). The RTX A400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 770 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 770.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $135 for the RTX A400, it costs 70% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 236.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+236.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($135) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770 and RTX A400
GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.
RTX A400
The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1762 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961 | 5,983 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS+23% | 2.706 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1762 MHz+62% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+433% | 24 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 50W-78% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9 | 119.7+362% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the RTX A400 launched at $135 and now averages $135. The GeForce GTX 770 costs 70.4% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 149.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the GeForce GTX 770 offers 236.3% better value. The RTX A400 is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | RTX A400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $135-66% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-70% | $135 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.0+236% | 44.3 |
| Codename | GK104 | GA107 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | April 16 2024 |
| Ranking | #398 | #397 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GTX 770 and RTX A400
