GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX A400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX A400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX A400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 770

2013

Why buy it

✅60.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
195.6% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$135 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.9 vs 44.3 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $135 MSRP).
❌360% higher power demand at 230W vs 50W.

RTX A400

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $264 less on MSRP ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Delivers 196.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.3 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($135 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 230W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 770 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 770 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward RTX A400 instead at 5,983 vs 5,961, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX A400 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2013. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX A400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $264 cheaper on MSRP at $135 vs $399, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 196.6% (44.3 vs 14.9), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. GeForce GTX 770 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX A400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 770

The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX A400

The RTX A400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 16 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 727 MHz to 1762 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,983 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the RTX A400 reaches 5,983 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the RTX A400 uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 768 (RTX A400). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2.706 TFLOPS (RTX A400). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1762 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 770	RTX A400
G3D Mark Score	5,961	5,983
Architecture	Kepler	Ampere
Process Node	28 nm	8 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.333 TFLOPS+23%	2.706 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1085 MHz	1762 MHz+62%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+433%	24

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GTX 770	RTX A400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770 and 128-bit on the RTX A400.

Feature	GeForce GTX 770	RTX A400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the RTX A400's 50W — a 128.6% difference. The RTX A400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (RTX A400). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 770	RTX A400
TDP	230W	50W-78%
Recommended PSU	600W	350W-42%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	80°C	—
Perf/Watt	25.9	119.7+362%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 770 came in at $399, while the RTX A400 launched at $135. On MSRP, RTX A400 was 66.2% cheaper ($264 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 44.3 (RTX A400) — the RTX A400 offers 197.3% better value. The newer card here is RTX A400 (2024 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GTX 770	RTX A400
MSRP	$399	$135-66%
Performance per Dollar	14.9	44.3+197%
Codename	GK104	GA107
Release	May 30 2013	April 16 2024
Ranking	#398	#397

Search GeForce GTX 770 on Amazon

Search RTX A400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.