
GeForce GTX 770

Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.
Quadro M4000M
2015Why buy it
- ✅11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GTX 770 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M4000M is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro M4000M
The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1013 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961 | 6,148+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+20% | 1,280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS+34% | 2.496 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+7% | 1013 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 480 KB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) — the Quadro M4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | NVENC 5 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | NVDEC 1 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 78.8% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 100W-57% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9 | 61.5+137% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro M4000M (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro M4000M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Codename | GK104 | GM204 |
| Release | May 30 2013 | August 18 2015 |
| Ranking | #398 | #392 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















