GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

2013Core: 1046 MHzBoost: 1085 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

2015Core: 975 MHzBoost: 1013 MHz
Similar parts
··

GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 770

2013

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro M4000M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 130% higher power demand at 230W vs 100W.

Quadro M4000M

2015

Why buy it

  • 11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • GeForce GTX 770 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro M4000M is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 100W instead of 230W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 14.9 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M4000M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.1% in PassMark G3D (6,148 vs 5,961), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M4000M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2015 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 770 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 770 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M4000M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro M4000M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 770

The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

NVIDIA

Quadro M4000M

The Quadro M4000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 1013 MHz. It has 1,280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,148 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Quadro M4000M reaches 6,148 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Quadro M4000M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 1 (Quadro M4000M). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2.496 TFLOPS (Quadro M4000M). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1013 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
G3D Mark Score
5,961
6,148+3%
Architecture
Kepler
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
1536+20%
1,280
Compute (TFLOPS)
3.333 TFLOPS+34%
2.496 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1085 MHz+7%
1013 MHz
ROPs
32
64+100%
TMUs
128+60%
80
L1 Cache
128 KB
480 KB+275%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 770 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro M4000M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770 and 256-bit on the Quadro M4000M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2 MB (Quadro M4000M) — the Quadro M4000M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit
256-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
2 MB+300%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 12 (12_1) (Quadro M4000M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
DirectX
12.0
12 (12_1)
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770) vs NVENC 5 (Quadro M4000M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs NVDEC 1. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770) vs H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX (Quadro M4000M).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
Encoder
NVENC 1st gen
NVENC 5
Decoder
PureVideo VP5
NVDEC 1
Codecs
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
H.264,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1,DivX
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Quadro M4000M's 100W — a 78.8% difference. The Quadro M4000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (Quadro M4000M). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
TDP
230W
100W-57%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
80°C
80°C
Perf/Watt
25.9
61.5+137%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro M4000M (2015 vs 2013).

FeatureGeForce GTX 770Quadro M4000M
MSRP
$399
Codename
GK104
GM204
Release
May 30 2013
August 18 2015
Ranking
#398
#392

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.