
GeForce GTX 770 vs Radeon R9 380X

GeForce GTX 770
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 380X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 380X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 770.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 770 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 770 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $58), it costs 31% less, resulting in a 41% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($58) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 770 and Radeon R9 380X

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon R9 380X
The Radeon R9 380X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 970 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,131 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Radeon R9 380X reaches 6,131 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 380X uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2,048 (Radeon R9 380X). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 3.973 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 380X). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 970 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961 | 6,131+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS | 3.973 TFLOPS+19% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+12% | 970 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 512 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 770) vs 106 GB/s (Radeon R9 380X) — a 111.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 770. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+111% | 106 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 380X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 770) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 380X). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 770) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R9 380X).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Radeon R9 380X's 250W — a 8.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 770 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 500W (Radeon R9 380X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 221mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W-8% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 221mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9+6% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 770 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon R9 380X launched at $229 and now averages $58. The GeForce GTX 770 costs 31% less ($18 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 149.0 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 105.7 (Radeon R9 380X) — the GeForce GTX 770 offers 41% better value. The Radeon R9 380X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Radeon R9 380X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $229-43% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-31% | $58 |
| Performance per Dollar | 149.0+41% | 105.7 |
| Codename | GK104 | Antigua |
| Release | May 30 2013 | November 19 2015 |
| Ranking | #398 | #394 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















