
GeForce GTX 770

Quadro K5200
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro K5200 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro K5200 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro K5200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 770
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 446.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 14.9 vs 2.7 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $2,250 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro K5200 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌53.3% higher power demand at 230W vs 150W.
Quadro K5200
2014Why buy it
- ✅27.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅GeForce GTX 770 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro K5200 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 230W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌463.9% HIGHER MSRP$2,250 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.7 vs 14.9 G3D/$ ($2,250 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 770 vs Quadro K5200 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 770
The GeForce GTX 770 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,961 points. Launch price was $399.

Quadro K5200
The Quadro K5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 667 MHz to 771 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,149 points. Launch price was $1,699.74.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 770 scores 5,961 and the Quadro K5200 reaches 6,149 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 770 is built on Kepler while the Quadro K5200 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2,304 (Quadro K5200). Raw compute: 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 770) vs 3.553 TFLOPS (Quadro K5200). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 771 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,961 | 6,149+3% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2304+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.333 TFLOPS | 3.553 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+41% | 771 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 128 | 192+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 770 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro K5200 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 770 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K5200 carries 8 GB. Quadro K5200 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 770) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K5200) — a 6.2% advantage for the GeForce GTX 770. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 770 and 256-bit on the Quadro K5200.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+6% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 770 draws 230W versus the Quadro K5200's 150W — a 42.1% difference. The Quadro K5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 770) vs 350W (Quadro K5200). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 230W | 150W-35% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 25.9 | 41.0+58% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 770 came in at $399, while the Quadro K5200 launched at $2250. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 770 was 82.3% cheaper ($1851 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.9 (GeForce GTX 770) vs 2.7 (Quadro K5200) — the GeForce GTX 770 offers 451.9% better value. The newer card here is Quadro K5200 (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 770 | Quadro K5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-82% | $2250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.9+452% | 2.7 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK110B |
| Release | May 30 2013 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #398 | #391 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















