UHD Graphics 600 vs FirePro V3800

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro V3800

#108

Quadro M6000

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $500

94%

#109

Quadro M6000 24GB

MSRP: $4999|Avg: $600

94%

#253

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

5933%

#268

FirePro V3800

MSRP: $129|Avg: $12

100%

#269

FirePro V5800

MSRP: $479|Avg: $15

99%

#270

FirePro 3D V7800

MSRP: $759|Avg: $40

99%

#271

FirePro S9050

MSRP: $1999|Avg: $1825

98%

#272

FirePro R5000

MSRP: $1099|Avg: $150

97%

#274

GRID M6-8Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

96%

#276

GRID K120Q

MSRP: $125|Avg: $20

94%

#277

Tesla M60

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $250

94%

#279

FirePro V7900

MSRP: $999|Avg: $120

91%

#280

GRID P6-4Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $150

89%

#281

GRID M60-8A

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

89%

#283

Quadro K4000

MSRP: $1269|Avg: $100

86%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro V3800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics 600.

Insight	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro V3800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Intel UHD Graphics 600 Benchmark Check

FirePro V3800 Benchmark Check

Loading...

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and FirePro V3800

Intel UHD Graphics 600

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.

FirePro V3800

The FirePro V3800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 26 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 690 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 74W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 321 points. Launch price was $479.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 scores 312 and the FirePro V3800 reaches 321 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is built on Generation 8.0 while the FirePro V3800 uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 800 (FirePro V3800). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 1.104 TFLOPS (FirePro V3800).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
G3D Mark Score	312	321+3%
Architecture	Generation 8.0	TeraScale 2
Process Node	14 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	192	800+317%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4032 TFLOPS	1.104 TFLOPS+174%
ROPs	3	16+433%
TMUs	24	40+67%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro V3800 has 4 GB. The FirePro V3800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 11.2 (FirePro V3800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
DirectX	12+7%	11.2
Vulkan	1.3	N/A
OpenGL	4.6+5%	4.4
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: QSV (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs None (FirePro V3800). Decoder: QSV vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (FirePro V3800).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
Encoder	QSV	None
Decoder	QSV	UVD 2.3
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 draws 15W versus the FirePro V3800's 74W — a 132.6% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 350W (FirePro V3800). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 80.

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
TDP	15W-80%	74W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	55°C-31%	80
Perf/Watt	20.8+384%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro V3800 launched at $129 and now averages $12. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 costs 100+% less ($12 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 26.8 (FirePro V3800) — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 offers Infinity% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Intel UHD Graphics 600	FirePro V3800
MSRP	$0-100%	$129
Avg Price (30d)	$0-100%	$12
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	26.8
Codename	Broadwell GT2	Juniper
Release	September 5 2014	April 26 2010
Ranking	#703	#780