
Intel UHD Graphics 615 vs Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

Intel UHD Graphics 615
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is positioned at rank 412 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is on rank 88, so the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics 615
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2009). The Intel UHD Graphics 615 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 615 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 615 and Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M

Intel UHD Graphics 615
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in November 7 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 717 points.

Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M
The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2009. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 699 points. Launch price was $159.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 scores 717 and the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M reaches 699 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is built on Generation 9.5 while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M uses TeraScale 2, both on 14 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 800 (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Raw compute: 0.4032 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 1.36 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 717+3% | 699 |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 800+317% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4032 TFLOPS | 1.36 TFLOPS+237% |
| ROPs | 3 | 16+433% |
| TMUs | 24 | 40+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M's 108W — a 151.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 615) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M). Power connectors: Integrated vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-86% | 108W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 1mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 47.8+635% | 6.5 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 615 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2009).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 615 | Radeon HD 7570M/HD 7670M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | — |
| Codename | Amber Lake GT2 | Juniper |
| Release | November 7 2018 | October 13 2009 |
| Ranking | #921 | #730 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















