Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs FirePro 3D V7800
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
FirePro 3D V7800
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is positioned at rank 263 and the FirePro 3D V7800 is on rank 270, so the Intel UHD Graphics P630 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V7800
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 uses modern memory architecture. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V7800 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The FirePro 3D V7800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (2 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (254mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The FirePro 3D V7800 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $50 for the Intel UHD Graphics P630, it costs 20% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 26.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+26.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and FirePro 3D V7800
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
FirePro 3D V7800
The FirePro 3D V7800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,867 points.
Graphics Performance
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 and the FirePro 3D V7800 reaches 1,867 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the FirePro 3D V7800 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm+++ vs 28 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V7800). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V7800).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848 | 1,867+1% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 2048+967% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 3.482 TFLOPS+656% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V7800 has 2 GB. The FirePro 3D V7800 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 11.0 (FirePro 3D V7800). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+12% | 4.1 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs UVD 2.3 (FirePro 3D V7800). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs UVD 2.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (FirePro 3D V7800).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | UVD 2.3 |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | UVD 2.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the FirePro 3D V7800's 274W — a 179.2% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V7800). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-95% | 274W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 254mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+1712% | 6.8 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the FirePro 3D V7800 launched at $759 and now averages $40. The FirePro 3D V7800 costs 20% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 46.7 (FirePro 3D V7800) — the FirePro 3D V7800 offers 26.2% better value. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | FirePro 3D V7800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-87% | $759 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50 | $40-20% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0 | 46.7+26% |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Tahiti |
| Release | May 24 2018 | January 18 2014 |
| Ranking | #640 | #423 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P630 and FirePro 3D V7800
