Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is positioned at rank #263 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Intel UHD Graphics P630
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 325.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-325.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+325.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $50), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 183.9% better value per dollar than the Intel UHD Graphics P630.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+183.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($50) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and GeForce GTX 1650
Intel UHD Graphics P630
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 24 2018. It features the Generation 9.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm+++ process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,848 points.
GeForce GTX 1650
The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel UHD Graphics P630 scores 1,848 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 325.8%. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is built on Generation 9.5 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 14 nm+++ vs 12 nm. Shader units: 192 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 0.4608 TFLOPS (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1200 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,848 | 7,869+326% |
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm+++ | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 192 | 896+367% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4608 TFLOPS | 2.984 TFLOPS+548% |
| Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz+39% |
| ROPs | 3 | 32+967% |
| TMUs | 24 | 56+133% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 3.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: Gen 9.5 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Coffee Lake) | NVENC 5th gen (Volta) |
| Decoder | Gen 9.5 | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC 10-bit,VP9 10-bit,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-80% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 300W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | None |
| Length | — | 229mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70°C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 123.2+17% | 104.9 |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics P630 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Intel UHD Graphics P630 costs 33.3% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 37.0 (Intel UHD Graphics P630) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 183.5% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $50-33% | $75 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.0 | 104.9+184% |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | TU117 |
| Release | May 24 2018 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #640 | #323 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics P630 and GeForce GTX 1650
